I have spent the last few weeks sulking about an
administrative error by West Ham which meant my ticket application for the
Tottenham match was never processed. It turns out that our hapless ticket
office probably did me a favour. Not because we lost. Away fans must make these
trips in hope rather than expectation, and brace themselves for the worst. When
I recently embarked on a 600-mile round trip to Newcastle, the victorious
outcome was a bonus rather than a prerequisite. No, what I spared myself on Sunday
was the discomfort of having the moronic thoughts of my fellow fans rammed down
my throat.
As with the possibility of defeat, it would have been naïve of
me to have gone to the match thinking that I would avoid any anti-Semitic
chanting. Ever since I have been attending West Ham-Tottenham matches, chants
about “fucking Jews” and mimicking the noise of gas chambers have been
commonplace. By commonplace, I mean that it happens at every one of these
fixtures, not that a large number of fans take part. Any West Ham supporter who
claims to be shocked by Sunday’s events betrays the fact that they haven’t
attended many West Ham derbies. I’ve never heard anyone specifically refer to
Hitler – as it appears 100-200 fans did on Sunday – but if you’re asking me whether
amongst a sample of some 3,000 fans I am surprised that a minority would say
something as moronic as "Adolf Hitler, he's coming for you", then no I’m not.
The Daily Mail were first to draw
attention to, and condemn, the Hitler references. It’s good to see that a
newspaper which supported Hitler when he was alive, has finally seen the error
of its ways. Lots of words have been used to describe this behaviour: vile; disgraceful; despicable; abhorrent. But what defence do we have to these descriptions? None. More to
the point, why would we even want to defend these morons?
I remember being in the away end at Elland Road in 2005,
when a bunch of neanderthals in the row in front of me sang this:
When West
Ham win and Tottenham lose
We’ll all
be gassing the Jews
I cannot put into words how disgusted that made me feel, and
how upset I was that another human being, West Ham fan or not, could actually refer to the killing of six million human beings in such a flippant, even
gleeful way. I didn’t want West Ham to score after that. I couldn’t bear
to see these scumbags derive any pleasure from the match. I just wanted the
game to be over.
The club has already come out and threatened those involved
with Sunday's chanting with life bans. It’s good to see them acting so quickly. Personally, I would have
no objection to a life ban for anyone found mimicking a gas chamber. Good
riddance.
The media is already full of vitriol. I would expect this
story to run for some time. Worryingly, this is being painted as a problem specific
to West Ham fans. This is an unhelpful way of viewing the situation, ignoring as
it does a very important truth: a significant minority of football fans across
the country hold very sick views and see the football ground as the platform to
voice them.
Tottenham fans themselves have a steep hill to climb before
they reach the moral high ground. It is they who regularly wished death upon
Sol Campbell, whether by AIDS or “hanging from a tree”. Is that better or worse
than singing “Can we stab you every week”? Does it matter? Isn’t it all just
different shades of the same sick mentality?
Do I think Tottenham fans are any worse than most? Of course
not. Millwall fans sing about Leeds fans being stabbed to death. Leeds fans
sing about Man United players dying in a plane crash. Man United fans sing
about 96 Liverpool fans being crushed to death. Liverpool fans sing this:
There’s
only one Harold Shipman
The Scousers give thanks
‘Cos he
only kills Mancs
Walking in
a Shipman wonderland
Last season, Nottingham Forest fans were appalled that their
neighbours Derby County would be so sick as to poke fun at the death of their
owner, Nigel Doughty. He who is without sin, boys. Is it any less acceptable
than singing to Leicester City fans: “You’re just a town full of pakis”?
And on it goes right down to League Two. My local team as a
child was Gillingham. A less offensive club you will struggle to find (in
2010/11, there were 326 banning orders in League Two, only one of which related
to Gillingham). But what was their fans’ reaction when in 1998 Fulham fan
Matthew Fox died at a match at the Priestfield Stadium following a fight outside
the ground? This charming song:
Who’s that
lying on the alleyway?
Who’s that
lying on the floor?
Its Matthew Fox and he ain't very
pleased
Cos he ain't going to Fulham anymore
Cos he ain't going to Fulham anymore
I was 15 when I stood on a Craven Cottage terrace surrounded
by grown men singing that. You’ll forgive me if very little shocks me anymore.
This is the sole aim of many fans: to wind up the
opposition. At any cost. The subject matter may change, but it’s all variations
on the same theme. Does anyone really think these anti-Semitic comments were
considered opinions from the West Ham fans? Was it a message about Israel’s aggressive
response to rocket attacks from Gaza? Of course not. It was just something to wind up the
Tottenham fans. The fact that the topic was so shocking made it all the more appealing. That’s why the Daily Mail’s “history lesson” for West Ham fans today so badly misses the point.
I would be very surprised – and disappointed – if West Ham,
part owned by a proud Jew, does not take severe action against
Sunday’s perpetrators. This is our opportunity to make a statement. But the
media and supporters of other clubs have a role to play in this, too. Put these events in the context of a
nationwide problem, and there’s a slight chance we can begin to think of ways
to tackle it. Paint it as a West Ham-specific problem, and we remain at square
one.
Follow Love In The Time Of Collison @OnWestHam
Follow Love In The Time Of Collison @OnWestHam
Strong and balanced argument; sense of perspective and a powerful kick in the fetid testicles of the Daily Mail. All in all, splendid stuff.
ReplyDelete